Skyscript Astrology Forum

Hi all.

Does anyone have any experience in using mundane astrology Sidereal zoodiaco?

Please tell me your results using the zoodiaco mundane astrology sidereal ayanamsa also used to attach what worldly sidereal astrology.

Please do know of a sidereal astrologer and / or Indian astrology predictions you made mundane and has had successes and failures, indicate in this message along with the ayanamsa used by it.

I think it is important to use a very precise and accurate ayanamsa in the practice of mundane astrology, because a small change in minutes of arc of a ayanamsa can give up and to various different positions of the Moon in the letters worldly income solar. Therefore, in the practice of mundane astrology with sidereal zoodiaco is important to use a ayanamsa accurate.

I've been experimenting with ayanamsa worldly "Sassanian" Masha'allah apparently used with the zero point to the 564 After Christ; equivalent to tables for Zij- al-Shahriyar. Remember that is (Masha'allah) about mundane astrology books. But I still need more research on this topic, so if anyone knows about this issue, I would appreciate this forum to help me.

I'm also doing mundane experiments with ayanamsa J.N Bashin, apparently, this is equivalent to the tables Al-jwarizmi used by the Persians.

Anyway, all ayanamsas give very different results in the position of the Moon and the Ascendant in the letters mundane solar income.

For this reason, I am aware of your answers regarding what is the most presiso ayanamsa and accurate in mundane astrology; Sustaining the reason for your choice.

Thank you very much to all in advance.

Diego Alejandro Torres wrote:Hi all.


I've been experimenting with ayanamsa worldly "Sassanian" Masha'allah apparently used with the zero point to the 564 After Christ; equivalent to tables for Zij- al-Shahriyar. Remember that is (Masha'allah) about mundane astrology books. But I still need more research on this topic, so if anyone knows about this issue, I would appreciate this forum to help me.

Hi Diego,
There is some information on the Sassanian ayanamsa in the article link below. That ayanamsa was based on faulty astronomical theory, and the Lahiri and Krishnamurti ayanamsas can be considered more reliable updates.
http://www.snowcrest.net/sunrise/aapers ... ology5.htm

Therese

It?s nothing in astrology, it IS astrology, the Sidereal Astrology. As old as 5000 year in ancient Babylon, it uses 12 equal signs based directly on the stars. There is an article awesome

asharcaa wrote:It?s nothing in astrology, it IS astrology, the Sidereal Astrology. As old as 5000 year in ancient Babylon, it uses 12 equal signs based directly on the stars. There is an article awesome

Easy. As far as I know, the scholarly consensus is that the earliest evidence for a sidereal zodiac of 12 equal signs dates less than 2500 years back.